Lighter TGE is approaching: What valuation is considered reasonable?

Original Title: A simple Lighter valuation framework (Bear/Base/Bull)
Original Author: @chuk_xyz
Compiled by: Peggy, BlockBeats

Editor’s Note: As Lighter approaches its TGE, the market's divergence on its valuation stems not from sentiment, but from differing understandings of its product positioning and growth path. Is it merely another perpetual contract exchange, or a trading infrastructure that has the potential to support greater distribution and asset forms? The answer determines the valuation ceiling.

This article attempts to break free from the lazy framework of "simple benchmarking" and return to more verifiable facts: the real TVL and trading volume scale, proven revenue capabilities, first-mover advantages in the RWA track, and a product expansion roadmap pointing to 2026. Based on this, the author provides a valuation range that does not rely on sentiment, using "zones" rather than "target prices" to address uncertainty.

Here is the original text:

As the TGE of Lighter approaches, there is a clear divergence in the market regarding "how much it is worth."

On one hand, some simply categorize it as "another perpetual contract exchange," believing it will struggle to outperform Hyperliquid; on the other hand, there are already some real market signals indicating that its scale and potential impact may far exceed that of a typical Perp DEX launch.

TL;DR: The current market pricing for Lighter is still primarily concentrated in the low single-digit billion dollar FDV range; however, if the fundamentals continue to materialize and key catalysts are gradually realized, its reasonable repricing range may be closer to $6 billion to $12.5 billion, or even higher.

Disclosure: I am an early user of Lighter (644.3 points) and will likely receive an airdrop. This article represents personal research and opinions and does not constitute any investment advice.

My Lighter points

In my view, the current situation is roughly as follows: based on trading on Polymarket, the market implicitly values Lighter at around $2 billion to $3 billion (at least based on the current trading price signals).

In the over-the-counter (OTC) market, the trading price for Lighter points is around $90; if calculated based on approximately 11.7 million points, the corresponding airdrop value is about $1.05 billion.
If this portion of the airdrop accounts for about 25% of the total token supply, then backtracking, Lighter's fully diluted valuation (FDV) is approximately $4.2 billion.

Lighter previously completed a $68 million financing round, corresponding to a valuation of about $1.5 billion, led by Founders Fund and Ribbit (according to Fortune reports).
Founders Fund has a long and distinguished track record of betting on category-defining companies, having invested in iconic enterprises such as Facebook, SpaceX, Palantir, Stripe, and Airbnb.

Additionally, the pricing of $LIT in the pre-market corresponds to an FDV of about $3.5 billion, which can be seen as a real-time market reference signal (although still in the early stages and not entirely precise).

Therefore, my judgment framework is actually quite simple: $1.5 billion can be seen as the valuation lower limit (bearish range, anchored by VC financing round pricing). $3 billion to $4.2 billion belongs to the bearish to baseline range (predicted market, pre-market prices, and point-derived valuations are roughly concentrated here).

The real core question is: based on fundamentals and catalysts, does Lighter deserve to be revalued to the range of $6 billion to $12.5 billion or even higher?

The purpose of this analysis is to attempt to clarify these questions logically: What exactly is Lighter as a product, what signals are released from the data level, which valuation frameworks are reasonable, and what catalysts may drive it further upward in revaluation.

1. A Key Misunderstanding: Lighter and Hyperliquid Are Not the Same Product

The clearest mental model I have found is:

Hyperliquid is building a Web3-native liquidity layer, with its primary monetization coming from retail trading fees (and adding ecological network effects).

Lighter, on the other hand, is building a decentralized trading infrastructure, with the long-term goal of connecting fintech companies, brokerages, and professional market makers, while keeping execution costs extremely low on the retail side (some spot markets even achieve 0% fees).

From this perspective, the problems they solve, the customer groups they serve, and their long-term business paths are fundamentally different.

Business model comparison: Lighter vs Hyperliquid, source: @eugene_bulltime

This distinction is important because it directly determines where the valuation ceiling lies.

If Lighter is merely "another perpetual contract exchange," then pricing it according to similar Perp DEXs would logically not be surprising; but if it is essentially a trading infrastructure that can be accessed by large distribution channels (brokerages/fintech companies), then the valuation ceiling it faces is an entirely different set of rules.

2. Where Lighter Currently Stands (The Truly Important Data)

First, let's look at the most critical set of metrics:

TVL: $1.44 billion

LLP TVL: $698 million (Lighter's liquidity pool for trade execution and system stability)

Open Interest: $1.7 billion

Trading Volume: 24 hours: $5.41 billion / 7 days: $44.4 billion / 30 days: $248.3 billion

Revenue: Last 30 days: approximately $13.8 million / Last year: approximately $167.9 million

The "quality" conveyed by these numbers is itself very important: this is already a real scale. A monthly trading volume of $248 billion is not that of a "hobbyist" exchange.

The open interest (OI) is substantial, but not so high as to trigger "systemic chaos from a single extreme liquidation."

The TVL is sufficiently high for Lighter to reasonably position itself as a trading venue capable of handling large transactions and maintaining stability—reliability is one of the core factors most valued by institutions.

Risk Rationality Check: OI / TVL (Open Interest / Total Locked Value)

A quick method to measure leverage levels and liquidity matching is to calculate OI/TVL (open interest divided by TVL). Based on the current snapshot data:

Lighter: $1.71B / $1.44B ≈ 1.18

Hyperliquid: $7.29B / $4.01B ≈ 1.82

Aster: $2.48B / $1.29B ≈ 1.92

Intuitively, Lighter's OI/TVL is significantly lower, indicating a more ample liquidity buffer under relatively controllable leverage levels. This structure does not pursue extreme efficiency but leans more towards robust execution and system resilience—which aligns with its positioning as an "infrastructure-type trading system."

Key Conclusion: Lighter already possesses a considerable scale of open interest, but overall it has not been overstretched relative to its liquidity levels; compared to the closest leading similar products, its risk structure is more restrained and robust.

3. Spot Market: The Key Unlocking Factor for Further TVL Growth

Lighter recently launched spot trading, and the importance of this may have been significantly underestimated by the market.

While perpetual contracts can indeed generate massive trading volumes, it is often the spot market that can solidify "sticky capital"—especially when the trading platform has clear advantages in execution efficiency and cost. Additionally, spot trading significantly broadens the potential user base: for new users, spot is a lower-barrier starting point; for market makers, spot provides more reasons to hold and allocate inventory on the platform over the long term.

Currently, ETH is the only spot asset that has been launched. This is not a limitation but a starting point. The truly noteworthy signal is that the "track" for spot trading has been opened up, and the product itself has the structural foundation to smoothly expand as more assets are launched.

Lighter spot token value chart (WETH) (source: DeFiLlama)

Even though only ETH has been launched so far, DeFiLlama data shows that Lighter's spot side has already solidified approximately $32.33 million in WETH value (snapshot date: 2025/12/18).
This is still in the early stages, but the signal is correct: funds have begun to "dock" on the spot side.

If Lighter follows the publicly hinted path and gradually introduces dozens (or even ultimately hundreds) of spot assets, then spot will become a substantial driving force for TVL growth, rather than just a "nice-to-have" functional module.

More importantly, the 0% fee on ETH spot trading is a strong wedge in itself. As long as execution quality remains stable (tight spreads, reliable transactions), it will naturally attract active traders and institutions to route high-frequency strategies and spot-perpetual basis trading to Lighter. The result is very direct: more trades → more inventory → deeper liquidity, forming a self-reinforcing positive feedback loop.

The conclusion is clear: the launch of spot trading is an important milestone. ETH is just the first step; the real upward potential comes from the expansion of the spot asset catalog, as the platform gradually becomes the default place for "trading + holding" on-chain.

4. RWA: The Unlocking Point for 2026 (And Why Lighter Is Already Ahead)

One of the clearest signals that Lighter is not "just another Perp DEX" comes from RWA (Real World Assets).

RWA (tokenized stocks, currencies, commodities, indices, etc.) essentially serves as a bridge between crypto trading and traditional markets. If by 2026, tokenized assets continue to migrate on-chain, then the trading platform that wins RWA first will gain not just more trading volume, but a new growth curve that most Perp DEXs are not prepared for.

The key is not the narrative, but the scoreboard. And from the data, Lighter is already ahead.

RWA Leadership: The Data Speaks

Lighter is already leading in both open interest (OI) and trading volume for on-chain RWA perpetual contracts. This combination is very critical:

OI reflects the scale of exposure that traders hold long-term;

Trading volume reflects the intensity and activity of daily usage.

When a trading venue leads in both metrics, it usually means that traders are not "testing the waters," but have already adopted it as their primary base for that product line.

This is why RWA is more like a structural opportunity for Lighter: it is not chasing a trend but is positioning itself early in a market that is about to expand.

RWA Open Interest: Lighter leads this track (source: PerpetualPulse.xyz)

In the current snapshot, the open interest for RWA perpetual contracts is approximately:

Lighter: about $273 million

Hyperliquid: about $249 million

The importance of this gap lies in the fact that RWA is still in its early stages. In early markets, liquidity often exhibits highly concentrated characteristics:

When a trading venue first gathers substantial liquidity, spreads will tighten, transaction quality will improve, and a better execution experience will, in turn, attract more funds and trading volume, forming a self-reinforcing positive feedback loop.

From this perspective, Lighter's lead in RWA OI is not just a static ranking but more like the starting point of potential compounding effects.

RWA Trading Volume: Lighter also leads in activity (source: PerpetualPulse.xyz)

From the trading volume perspective, this trend is even clearer:

Lighter: about $484 million

Hyperliquid: about $327 million

This is a typical form of early product-market fit (PMF): a new category begins to take shape, and a particular trading venue first absorbs a disproportionate amount of trading activity. When usage frequency and execution experience continue to accumulate on the same platform, the leading advantage is often further amplified.

The Market Size Is Underestimated

It is worth taking a broader view: tokenized RWA is not a niche track. On public chains, it has already become a multi-billion dollar market, and the growth curve is still upward. This means that the platform that first establishes liquidity, execution quality, and user habits is not just winning current trading volume, but is also locking in a long-term growth channel that is still expanding.

"Global Market Overview" dashboard (source: rwa.xyz)

The scale of tokenized RWA on public chains has reached approximately $18.9 billion and is still in its early stages.

This is important because RWA is one of the few narratives that does not need to "compete for attention" within the crypto circle: it can extend outward, bringing real-world assets and real-world trading behaviors on-chain, directly creating increments rather than internal competition.

Why This Is a Major Valuation Catalyst

RWA perpetual contracts have already validated real demand; but the bigger unlocking point lies in the next step: RWA spot.

Perpetual contracts excel at speculation;

Spot is key to expanding the user base.

If Lighter can become one of the earliest platforms to provide credible RWA spot trading (tokenized stocks/currencies/commodities) on-chain, while also achieving strong execution quality and institutional-level reliability, it would not just add a feature but substantially expand the addressable market (TAM).

This is also directly related to the narrative alignment with Robinhood: once tokenized stocks become a real product distribution channel, the value of the "back-end exchange/infrastructure layer" will be significantly amplified—because in the trading field, distribution capability is always the hardest moat to build.

The Roadmap Supports This Direction

From the product roadmap, Lighter is clearly pointing towards 2026: deeper RWA expansion and the supporting capabilities needed for scaling (mobile, portfolio margin, prediction markets, etc.).

This is not a one-time narrative but a continuously amplifying product curve.

Chainlink × Lighter Seoul offline event "2026 -- Expansion" roadmap slide

If RWA is one of the most important themes for 2026, then entering early and already leading in OI and trading volume is itself a very strong starting move.

The conclusion is clear: RWA is not a "side task" for Lighter. On the contrary, it is more like the clearest path to achieving extraordinary growth in 2026-2027—because this path expands Lighter from a purely crypto-native perpetual contract market to a broader world of tokenized financial products.

5. Robinhood Alignment Narrative: Why "Distribution" Will Change Everything

Robinhood is currently the cleanest and most imaginative distribution wedge on the table: about 26 million funded accounts, approximately $333 billion in assets under management (AUM).

A mature model: routing order flow to large market makers (a typical Citadel-style flow structure).

Once Robinhood becomes a real distribution channel for tokenized assets, the back-end trading infrastructure providing execution and settlement tracks will become extremely valuable—because in the trading field, distribution capability is always the hardest moat to build.

If Lighter can become one of the back-end tracks for tokenized assets/perpetual contracts/settlement flow (even if only partially involved), its impact is not just "adding some crypto users," but: bringing entirely new liquidity into the on-chain market through a familiar front-end UI.

The significance for valuation is that it directly attacks the biggest ceiling faced by most Perp DEXs: Web3-native liquidity is substantial, but compared to the distribution capabilities of traditional finance, it still has limits.

And the market often does not wait for everything to settle. Even if this narrative only has "a certain probability of becoming mainstream," it is enough to trigger a repricing—because the crypto market prices probabilities, not certainties themselves.

Lighter's "TradFi & Fintech" infrastructure positioning (source: X @Eugene_Bulltime)

6. Valuation: A Simplified Framework Not Based on "Belief"

I prefer to use anchors + reality checks for valuation.

Valuation Anchors (Information Already Provided by the Market)

$1.5 billion FDV: lower limit/bearish anchor (from the $68 million financing round VC pricing). Falling below this level means that this financing round has been in a loss state from the beginning.

Approximately $4.2 billion FDV: market implicit anchor (OTC point pricing + backtrack from the community's approximately 25% allocation).

Reality Check #1: FDV / TVL Comparison

If we price Lighter at ~5× TVL: $1.44B TVL × 5 ≈ $7.2 billion FDV

This is not arbitrary but aligns with the clustering ranges of similar platforms:

Hyperliquid: ~5.8× FDV/TVL

Aster: ~4.2× FDV/TVL

Therefore, as long as TVL can be maintained and Lighter continues to prove its leading position in trading volume and OI, a $7-8 billion FDV is a reasonable "fair value" range.

Reality Check #2: Revenue Comparison (Imperfect but Important)

Revenue is not the only valuation method in crypto (narrative is also important), but it is one of the hardest reality anchors that can verify whether "usage has really turned into cash flow."

Annualized revenue (1 year) estimates:

Hyperliquid: ~$900 million

Aster: ~$513 million

Lighter: ~ $167.9 million

dYdX: ~ $10.9 million

Two conclusions can coexist: the revenue gap is real. Lighter's current revenue is lower than that of Hyperliquid and Aster, which is a reasonable justification for the market's discount on it today. If someone prices Lighter directly as "the next Hyperliquid," revenue is the most direct rebuttal point.

As an unlaunched, not fully deployed product platform, this revenue is still solid. An annualized ~ $167.9 million is not "common." It does not automatically prove that a higher FDV is immediately reasonable, but clearly indicates that Lighter is not running on atmosphere but is operating a real, monetizable business.

How the Valuation Range Falls

Bear/Base (FDV $1.5-7.5 billion):
As long as TVL holds steady and continues to prove its leading position in trading volume/OI, even with a revenue gap, this range can stand firm.

Bull Market (FDV $7.5-12.5 billion+):
Catalysts need to become consensus, specifically including:
(a) faster revenue growth;
(b) higher and sustainable activity; or
(c) the market is willing to price in mainstream distribution narratives in advance.

In summary: revenue is the "proof point." It puts pressure on short-term multiples but is also a strong signal that Lighter already possesses real traction; the upward space depends on whether revenue growth significantly accelerates after product expansion.

7. Scenario Assumptions (Truly "Makes Sense" FDV Ranges)

Bear Market Scenario: $1.5-4.2 billion FDV
Assumption: Weak market + TGE selling pressure + narrative absence. Prices hover around the VC lower limit or slightly above the implied value of points.

Base Scenario: $4.2-7.5 billion FDV
Assumption: Pricing returns to fundamentals. TVL maintains above $1 billion, trading volume/OI remains at the top, priced according to comparable multiples.

Bull Market Scenario: $7.5-12.5 billion+ FDV
Assumption: Catalysts form consensus, including:

Sustained RWA momentum + clear RWA spot path; and/or

Robinhood-style distribution narrative is widely accepted (even if not fully confirmed yet).

8. Roadmap Signals: Why 2026 May Be the True Year of Expansion

Considering the product rhythm and narrative path, 2026 looks more like a key year for Lighter's amplification curve:

Deeper RWA, spot expansion, mobile and portfolio margin improvements—these are not isolated functions but point towards greater distribution and higher monetization efficiency.

Lighter 2026 Expansion Roadmap (Seoul offline event slide)

Lighter has already shown impressive traction in 2025, but what will truly change the valuation ceiling is what happens next.

At the Chainlink × Lighter Seoul Meetup, a roadmap labeled "2026 -- Expansion" was leaked, including:

ZK EVM, RWA Perps, RWA Spot, Portfolio Margin, Mobile App, Prediction Markets, S3/Tokenomics… and more.

Even if viewed as "informal information before official confirmation," when you connect it with Lighter's currently validated capabilities—stable execution, rapid delivery, and clear momentum in RWA—this directional line is highly coherent.

Why This Roadmap Is Important for Valuation

1) Expanding the Product Surface (More Growth Paths for TVL and Trading Volume)

A DEX can grow large solely through perpetual contracts; however, adding spot, especially the path to RWA spot, will significantly broaden the funnel.
Spot is stickier, better for TVL accumulation, and will attract a type of user not centered on 50× leverage.

2) Enhancing Capital Efficiency (Portfolio Margin Is Key)

Portfolio margin may not sound sexy, but it is what institutions and professional traders truly care about.
It allows funds to work collaboratively across different positions, reducing fragmentation, thereby increasing activity without proportionally increasing new deposits.

3) Upgrading Distribution (Mobile)

Most retail trading occurs on mobile.
If Lighter wants to be a viable alternative to the "one-click trading" experience of Binance and Robinhood, a native mobile app is not just a bonus but a direct growth lever.

4) Doubling Down on the Strongest Narrative (RWA)

RWA is not just a new market but the clearest bridge to non-crypto-native demand.
The roadmap explicitly mentions RWA Perps + RWA Spot, signaling that this is a core strategy, not a peripheral function.

5) Increasing Optionality (Prediction Markets + "More")

Prediction markets have repeatedly validated demand in crypto.
If integrated into a larger trading stack, it could form a new product line with high participation, enhancing retention and keeping users within the same ecosystem.

9. Risks That Need Serious Consideration

Market Environment: The current total crypto market cap is about $2.96 trillion, significantly lower than the $4.27 trillion ATH in October 2025. If the macro environment continues to weaken, all assets will come under pressure.

Post-TGE Behavior: Short-term selling pressure is almost certain; the key observation point is whether TVL/trading volume stabilizes after initial volatility.

Real Competition Exists: Hyperliquid has strong product capabilities, and other platforms will quickly replicate features.

Narrative vs Confirmation: Narratives like Robinhood/RWA spot may experience overheating pullbacks if the timeline is extended.

Closing Thoughts

The lazy valuation method is: "It's a Perp DEX → Benchmark against Hyperliquid → Apply a discount → Done."
A better approach is to acknowledge these differences:

The scale is already real (TVL, trading volume, revenue).

RWA appears to be a structural wedge, not a side task.

The product direction points to a broader market (Perps → Spot → Margin → New Verticals).

Once fintech/brokerage distribution lands even partially, the ceiling is no longer "just another crypto exchange."

Thus, my framework is: $1.5 billion is the bottom, ~$4.2 billion is the cleanest market anchor derived from point pricing; as long as TVL holds steady and catalysts continue to materialize, discussions of fair value should start from ~$7 billion and above.

How I’m thinking about the zones (not investment advice, just personal planning)

$LIT Valuation Scenario Analysis

To maintain my discipline, I treat these FDV ranges as "zones" rather than precise target prices.

Bear Market Zone ($1.5-4.2 billion FDV)

If the price oscillates within this range post-TGE, I will view it as an "opportunity zone."

Holding the airdrop here minimizes my psychological pressure; for those who truly agree with this logic, this is also the cleanest area for risk-reward—because the traction from TVL, trading volume, and RWA is already visible and verifiable.

Base Market Zone ($4.2-7.5 billion FDV)

If Lighter can stabilize TVL and continue to operate at a leading scale, I will view this range as fair value.

If the price reaches here, I would personally consider partial profit-taking ("recouping costs") while still maintaining exposure. The reason is simple: the 2026 roadmap is precisely the kind of configuration that can gradually raise the valuation ceiling—including RWA, spot expansion, portfolio margin, mobile, etc.

Bull Market Zone ($7.5-12.5 billion+ FDV)

This is a zone where "catalysts have become consensus."

If Lighter trades here, it often means that RWA momentum has become undeniable, and/or the distribution narrative (fintech/brokerage alignment) is starting to be taken seriously by the market.
In this case, I would be more proactive in managing risk during the upswing, as this is a position where the crypto market can easily overshoot and quickly reverse.

In summary: I am not trying to catch the top. I just want a plan that allows me to navigate volatility, take profits without regrets, and still maintain exposure when Lighter successfully executes to 2026.

[Original Link]